Comey Leak

Summer, Summer, Summertime

David B. Armstrong, CFA Weekly Market Commentary

Share this post!

Last week saw a big drop for tech, which dragged the Nasdaq down 1.8%…its third worst day of the year, and worst week year-to-date (-1.5%). What made this big drop so distinctive? It came the day after setting a new all-time high.

Other than a 2.6% drop in May, (yes, the year is almost half over…) you have to go all the way back to March of 2000 to find the last time the Nasdaq saw a larger drop from an all-time high.

If you read through this amazing blog, you will see I have a good old memory jogger from that era. Man, I’m old… I just used the word “era”.

I’m seeing a ton of charts that say something along the lines of, “Are We About to See Another 1987?” For example, see this chart below.

Another 1987 Crash

Comparing one price chart to another doesn’t indicate a thing…

Percentage Basis

Don’t fall for “no banana in the tailpipe”.

Banana Tailpipe

Summer, Summer, Summertime…


Dorsey Wright & Associates published a research report early June to identify any particular months that affect the summertime returns.  They compiled a monthly summary of S&P 500 returns going back to 1958.

Monthly S&P Returns 1958

What they found was that the summer months, June, July and August, tend to have a lower median return (the yellow triangle) than most of the other months of the year.  Interestingly, the month of September was the one that that has historically provided the lowest median return, clocking in at -0.49%.

However, September is closely followed by both July (-0.22%) and June (0.01%).

August’s median return comes in as the 6th worst month.

What is interesting is that the spread between the max return in a given month versus the minimum return in a given month is actually pretty low in the Summer (namely June and July) compared to the rest of the months.

Take a look at June. June has a max return of 5.45% in the last 59 years, while every other month except February reached at least 8%…clearly June hasn’t been able to achieve the upside compared with other months.

However, it’s not just the month of June.  You’ll see the opposite going on in August, which participated to the downside more than every month except October.  The worst August observed experienced a loss of -14.56%.  This is significant when compared to the other months’ minimums, which clock in around -10% (except October).

The point is that while you will hear a lot about the summer doldrums (the old “Sell in May and Go Away” adage), the data seem to support that the gloom cannot necessarily be contained in just one of the three months.

What Does That Mean for You?

Hopefully nothing, because you are an investor with a plan and not a trader.  What this means for you is that you may see some volatility combined with flat returns and you just need to chill and stick to your plan.  None of this can be used to forecast, so the best course of action is to determine if you need cash for something over the next year.  If so, the market is at a high and if you raise the cash now you won’t be unhappy.

Speaking of the Market

It’s that time again to remind everyone about the S&P 500.  There is no perfect equity benchmark for comparing your portfolio returns. The S&P is often quoted in the press and it’s not a bad one.  We use it a lot when discussing the overall market.  It has good and bad qualities…

The Good: It has 500 stocks, covers large, mid and small caps and includes some U.S. companies that derive some revenue from overseas (emphasis – SOME).

The Bad: While it has 500 stocks, it is market cap weighted. This means that the stocks with the highest market cap have the most “power” over the moves in the index than smaller capitalization stocks.  This means that Apple ($762.5b) is going to have much more “power” over the index going up and down every day than, say, AutoZone ($4.3b).

Here’s the thing you need to be aware of – if you focus on “the market” as defined as the S&P 500, you need to know that the largest of the large stocks in the S&P 500 (Apple, Google, Netflix, Amazon and Facebook) are up big this year and are carrying the index.  They are up on a percentage basis year-to-date of +26.28, +22.92, +22.46, +30.26, and +30.62, respectively (Source: FactSet).

These stocks are often referred to as FAANG stocks: Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix and Google.

Now don’t get it twisted – those are good returns for individual stocks and if you own them, you are happy (or if an ETF that you own includes them, you are happy, too).

However, here are the P/E ratios today: 16.99x, 32.56x, 198.18x, 182.15x, and 39.43x, respectively (Source: FactSet).  Compare those P/E’s against the charted P/E’s below for the S&P 500, which shows the P/E based on the last 12 months’ actual earnings (LTM in yellow) and the projected next 12 months (forward) earnings (NTM in Blue) at 20.69x and 17.71x, respectively.

Crash course – P/E ratio (the Price to earnings ratio) shows you how many dollars you will pay in order to get a dollar of the company’s earnings.  It’s called a “multiple” and stated like this, “The S&P 500 is trading at 17.71 times forward earnings,” where the word “times” is expressed with an “x”.

Notice how the only stock even close in P/E is Apple at 16.99x?  The next closest is almost double – Google at 32.56x.

The only reason you’d spend $198 for $1 of earnings versus $17 for $1 of earnings is because you believe that value of the of the $198 stock will continue to increase. At some point that rational turns the other way…

Bonus – See the chart of Cisco from 1990 to June of 2001, below.  The first is the price chart from January 1st, 1990 to June 1st, 2001. The second is the P/E ratio over the same time.  Pay attention to the P/E high of 225x.

See my point?

Stocks get expensive – sometimes ridiculously so.


Cisco Dark

(Thanks to FactSet for the chart above and below.)

PE NTM Chart

As those stocks keep going up in value, their market cap increases (market cap = stock price * total shares outstanding) and they have more and more “power”, which can become dangerous when markets reverse.

Very dangerous…


Right now, by my calculations, 50 stocks equal roughly 50% of the total weighting of the S&P 500…meaning the other 50% weighting is allocated across the 450 remaining stocks.

Remember, the S&P 500 may be 500 stocks, but it is not as well diversified as you may think.  A well-diversified portfolio is globally diversified across different economies, styles and sectors. That is a lot different than one index heavily weighted towards the top 10, 25 or even 50 stocks.

If your equity portfolios are performing close to the S&P 500 without these stocks, that’s pretty good.

If you take a well-diversified portfolio and start stretching to meet the S&P 500 returns by adding risk, YOU ARE ADDING RISK TO A DIVERSIFIED PORTFOLIO.

Be careful in these times trying to benchmark the S&P 500…

Give us a call with any questions.


Important Disclosure Information

Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by Monument Wealth Management), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this blog will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. All indexes referenced are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. The economic forecasts set forth may not develop as predicted. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this blog serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from Monument Wealth Management. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. Monument Wealth Management is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the blog content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of Monument Wealth Management’s current written disclosure statement discussing our advisory services and fees is available for review upon request.


About the Author
David B. Armstrong, CFA

David B. Armstrong, CFA

David B. Armstrong, CFA, is a President and Co-Founder of Monument Wealth Management. Along with his role as the firm’s chief investment strategist and portfolio manager, Armstrong is viewed as an industry leader in several areas including innovative practice management, discretionary asset management, digital marketing and social media. Dave is the writer of Monument Wealth Management's weekly "Off the Wall" Financial Blog and Market Commentary, and is frequently sought after by journalists and event coordinators. Visit his full biography here.

Share this post!